Colloidal Silver (An Analytical - Investigative Report & Theoretical Overview)
(1) Introduction
As you may know the FDA ruled several years ago that, colloidal silver is not legal in OTC products. OTC meaning, over the counter use, meaning in essence that it is not to be used as a medicine. For more information about the legal aspects of colloidal silver, click on the "Research" link at the top of the main page, it is important reading for people interested in manufacturing colloidal silver for any kind of commercial purpose.
Welcome to one of the most important areas of research of this or any era. After years of personal research and contemplation on the subject of ?colloidal silver?. I have concluded that the disciplines involved are too numerous for my presentation to be all things to all people, but that is still my goal.
One of the main problems is that each area of expertise has a highly specialized system and jargon, which does not always translate well between other disciplines. Quantum mechanics, Physics, colloidal chemistry etc. each has within the general area of study, highly specialized areas of focus. For example ?Electro-chemistry in colloids and dispersions? Is a specialized field of study within colloidal chemistry, though there many others examples.
Each discipline and area of focus in turn leads to a staggering number of potential applications.
My sincere belief is that the most needed research involves use of colloids in improving the human and planetary condition, the material will therefore reflect this conviction and area of focus.
My desire is to present this material in such a way that the broadest number of people, from the most varied number of backgrounds possible, may easily read and understand what it is that I want to convey. So that is how I intend to present this material.
There is no reason why scientific study cannot be alive, vibrant, interesting and relevant to anyone and everyone. I think you will find the material here more than just interesting and not just for scientists.
I have attempted to satisfy my need for a complete explanation of critical fundamental issues regarding the nature of colloids, and why they do the things they do. In my attempt to use existing orthodox scientific principles I have found them to be lacking in scope, inconclusive and biased toward the mechanistic.
A mechanistic approach may be provable and applicable where machines and mechanistic systems are concerned, but they falter and are rendered invalid where bio-systems are concerned. Looking at the state of the world today it does not take a genius to recognize that the mechanistic / technological status quo, is out of balance, and if left to continue unchallenged will lead to a self terminating end. There is no time to waste, in order to right this wrong.
Orthodox principles that are in vogue are not a sound approach where living systems are concerned. A very one-sided approach has been accepted as status quo, which is in dire need of some serious rethinking. They do not know as much as they would lead you to believe. Belief in a narrow view has caused many to overlook the overview. There are existing theorems already presented to academia since the early 1900?s. that are provable, valid and all encompassing, that could be embraced. Such valid theorems could create balanced harmonious, sustainable scientific technological approaches, and solutions.
Currently theorems that are accepted as irrefutable fact, when challenged with evidence that is contrary, and possibly invalidates its basic premise, are patently invalidated. Rather than rewriting the science books, and adjusting the theory, the evidence is patently admonished as invalid.
For example: Acceptance of the theory of relativity presupposes that a free energy device is not possible. Any device proclaimed to produce free energy supposedly violates the laws of energy conservation. What should happen instead is that, at the true presentation of a valid free energy device, the law of energy conservation should be found to be in violation of the laws of nature!
For example: A Patent was awarded for: Zero-Point Energy Extraction Device, on December 31, 1996. U.S. Patent Number 5,590,031 has been awarded to Franklin B. Mead Jr. and Jack Nachamkin. Their patent is for a system that converts electromagnetic radiation energy to electrical energy. Opening the door to the development of technologies that are in violation of the so-called ?Law of Energy Conservation.?
US patent here:
http://patents.uspto.gov/cgi-bin/ifetch4?ENG+PATBIB-ALL+0+960878+0+4+121427+OF+1+1+1+PN%2f5590031
The point is being made, because it illustrates that there is plenty of room for changes in our perspective. Where colloids are concerned, in time, there will no doubt be found, principles and phenomena that are intertwined with many other seemingly unrelated fields of research and endeavor. There may be a correlation to free energy of or called ?zero point energy.? This could actually most easily relate to colloids and bio-systems, so is not only relevant, but also helps frame perspectives to help with an explanation and understanding of the underlying principles involved with this science as a whole.
If colloidal silver / silver mineral water proves effective in lab tests against pathogens, which it has, why wouldn?t clinical testing follow? Why wouldn?t formal testing be considered for use with humans. If silver water is effective against organisms that cause disease in humans in a lab, as it has been shown. Why then would it not be even considered for uses in medicine? Why would research for potential applications such as an antibiotic be abandoned before the research is started? Is it because the concept of such profound effects from simple mineral water are contrary to poplar belief? With profound results from lab tests pointing the way, and justifying continued serious research, to do otherwise is testimony to an error in thinking on the part of researchers.
VICTOR SCHAUBERGER (1885 ? 1958) will in time be found to be the founder of harmonious systems of thought. It is unfortunate that he is not widely recognized by all sciences and academia. It seems he suffered a similar fate as did Nicola Tesla. ? Cheers Victor -
Next Article: What Is A Colloid?
